Posts Tagged ‘risk mitigation’

Proposed Offshore-Drilling Safety Institute: Help or Hinderance?

Friday, March 11th, 2011 by admin

According to a recent article from the Houston Business Journal “Energy industry considers offshore-drilling safety institute,” on March 18th, energy leaders will decide upon forming an industry run offshore-drilling safety institute in response to the Deepwater Horizon spill.

Reilly — who sits on the board of directors at Houston-based ConocoPhillips — called for a framework of continual learning among companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico. An industry organization should conduct routine safety audits of its members and “discipline or reject” companies that do not comply, he said. The government should support the organization and make its membership a prerequisite for operating in the Gulf, he said.

Here is some food for thought:

  • So is this a redundancy to the federal law recently passed – Workplace Safety Rule?
  • Will the costs of joining and complying with a offshore-drilling safety institute be too high for smaller or even large operators?
  • Will the standardization of “best practices” ultimately improve company margins while reducing health, safety, environmental and operational risks?

Benefit of Third Party View

Saturday, March 6th, 2010 by kkmolly

Below is a quick video that tests your ability to see clearly when in a competitive situation. Click on it first before reading the remainder of this blog. perception test

………………………………….

I like this video because it illustrates the value of having a third party perspective. Project managers and attorneys are frequently focused on the “ball” during a project and/or during a project dispute. Third parties, such as experienced construction experts, look at the ball within the situation, such as the [deleted] in the clip. The value added includes the following:

  1. Bringing in an expert into the project development team or early phase of a dispute to identify potential risks to project success and alternate strategies.
  2. In addition to being an expert in the field, having the ability to see the big picture as well as the details so that action plans can be re-baselined if needed and the self-audit process to ensure the dual perspective is being met.
  3. Bringing reality and stability to a situation by having an independent separate fact from emotion or perception, which promotes effective resolution of issue.